×

Open WeChat and scan the QR code
Subscribe to our WeChat public account

Home About Us Practices Sectors Professionals News Offices Tahota Cloud Online Join Us Contact us CN EN JP
×

Scan code and share

News

Tahota Law Firm Helped Win the Lawsuit of a Large Sum of Patent Award and Reward

2015-02-06 Views:6095

Senior partner of Tahota Law Firm Yingmei Han and full-time lawyer Yun Zhang (from Beijing Office) were the attorney agents of Lier Chemical Limited Liability Company (hereafter referred to as Lier Chemical, a listed company in Shenzhen Stock Exchange with the share code of 002258) in the lawsuit with a former employee about patent award and reward. After the trial in Sichuan Mianyang City Intermediate People's Court, the former employee’s request that Lier Chemical should pay him 33 million as patent award and reward was rejected.

This lawsuit was complex and concerned a large sum of money. There were such questions as how to make clear the patent reward contractual way in technology development agreement, whether the company regulations are still suitable if the way is not clear, whether the regulations are legal without discussing by the workers’ congress and labor union, whether the staff are aware of the regulations, whether only technology innovations but not patents or patent rewards are included in the regulations, whether to understand “bonus” as position invention award or patent reward, how to include patent invention as a new part of regulation, whether the money paid before regulations can be regarded as patent reward, how to calculate patent reward, what is the role of patent invention in the whole engineering process, what is the relationship between the stock right given as stock ownership incentive and patent reward, what is the connection between profits gained by selling shares on a secondary market and patent reward, what is the prescribed period for litigation and how to understand rationality of patent reward payment written in patent laws.

Tahota lawyers worked hard and made clear all the facts through careful legal analysis. The Court agreed with the agents’ opinions and rejected the requirement of the former employee.

Copyright TAHOTA LAW FIRM
蜀ICP备09019152号-3

罗茨风机  南宇卫浴  集装箱竹地板  领响PDF工具研发  之间设计  RoHS认证检测  复生鑫眼镜  碳钢管件  公岸网络科技  全景漫游  原创布衣改良中式女装  一鸣天下信息技术  防盗门十大品牌  快乐家居  美的空调售后  101不動產仲介行  广州数码港  宁夏季福通公司  软龙网全国站  海外药品直邮网  平利县一茗茶业有限责任公司  数字校园平台